Jump to content


Next High Impact Market News Event:
Retrieving events...


Toggle shoutbox The Traders Chat Open the Shoutbox in a popup

@  Cookiebrawler : (17 September 2019 - 04:27 PM) MegaMoney 90%
@  aasir : (16 September 2019 - 10:25 PM) Binary Triumph
@  traderpusa : (10 September 2019 - 01:35 AM) that was my bmw lol. E60.
@  Monoaldo : (10 September 2019 - 01:34 AM) E60
@  manfloy : (09 September 2019 - 11:12 AM) well said.
@  traderpusa : (09 September 2019 - 11:07 AM) at least for the moment, china will hold back because of economic conditions. My guess is they want to involve PLA but simply are not in a position to do so for the moment.
@  traderpusa : (09 September 2019 - 11:05 AM) well, regardless of any agreement between uk and europe, there is still nato is trump doesn't blow it up lol
@  manfloy : (09 September 2019 - 11:04 AM) I am really worried about HK if the PLA phase in this can interrupt the entire chain between FX liquidity and current import / export countries. I understand that we have a bunch of corporations exposed to China, now believe that 99 percent of them are stable in HK because they have a high law. If the PLA gets in, they'll substitute this economic centre with a singapore.
@  manfloy : (09 September 2019 - 11:04 AM) Yeah, they're really a very significant player. I am informed that there is also a lot more than economic, for instance there are a number of military agreements agreed between the GB and the EU, which is serious.
@  traderpusa : (09 September 2019 - 11:02 AM) the UK being part of the EU GDP figures, but not part of the Euro only makes things a bit complicated on how to interpret numbers for trading purposes.
@  traderpusa : (09 September 2019 - 11:00 AM) of course one needs to focus on US being the biggest economy but UK is still up there. https://gyazo.com/42...39df1c7c58d9221
@  manfloy : (09 September 2019 - 10:56 AM) I'm focused on the US, so I don't spend so much on the GB, I'm supposed to study it well since 2015, but something has altered worldwide, literally, it's an enormous step in the world's liquidity and global system, modifications are nice, but they're really colorful.
@  manfloy : (09 September 2019 - 10:56 AM) thanks good reading
@  traderpusa : (09 September 2019 - 10:53 AM) As to China, read this over the weekend : https://apnews.com/6...f75f013bf54e6a9
@  manfloy : (09 September 2019 - 10:51 AM) Spectacular indeed lol, this is huge to be honest
@  traderpusa : (09 September 2019 - 10:47 AM) it's gonna be interesting. MP's are leaving the sinking ship and now also Bercow has resigned. Gonna miss this guy lol
@  traderpusa : (09 September 2019 - 10:46 AM) https://gyazo.com/58...16d785753060ff0
@  manfloy : (09 September 2019 - 10:44 AM) I am very concerned about GBP, I have decided to leave until the government is making some definite deals on the Brexit. I'm not a supporter of uncertainty.
@  manfloy : (09 September 2019 - 10:42 AM) US It is expected to rebound until new years, because the season is coming and everyone is ready for new year revenues.
@  manfloy : (09 September 2019 - 10:41 AM) China is underwater now, and I can't even define how starving they are for dollars. Their imports fell significantly last quarter. They're trying to stimulate again, but I don't think it should work out, more than: we're back to the 2014/2015 situation. The issue with the Chinese central bank cutting off the supply of cash, the issue that they are not diversified around the world.

Photo

This info makes any strategy a holygrail

holygrail arrow percentage accuarte 5min 15min 30min signals

  • Please log in to reply
408 replies to this topic

#41 tarilab

tarilab

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 13 posts

Posted 19 October 2016 - 04:12 PM

It can't be true :) Nothing is brewing here!

 

Let xBeast explain this for us... and tarilab is my math and coding correct even?

Hahaha! Well, I guess Xbeast would provide a better rule on how to place trades using this tool. But I dunno what you did, but like i said earlier; it does look promising. Your Coding and Math are Probably on track. Maybe a few tweaks here and there. Nice one!


  • teodomiro likes this

#42 wags

wags

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,285 posts

Posted 19 October 2016 - 04:57 PM

Shouldnt this:

 

if( ( (y/(x+y))*100 ) != 0)
         put_proc = ( (y/(x+y))*100 );
      else
         put_proc = 0;

 

Be This?

 

if( ( (y/(y-x))*100 ) != 0)
         put_proc = ( (y/(y-x))*100 );
      else
         put_proc = 0;


Here is the MTF tools for charts below
 
Attached File  ACP Multi Pair.mq4   2.17KB   399 downloads
Attached File  ACP Arrow Change Pair.mq4   26.49KB   433 downloads
 
Please goto Lazy Larry post http://www.binaryopt...hread/?p=144478for a guide :)

 


#43 wags

wags

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,285 posts

Posted 19 October 2016 - 05:38 PM

Shouldnt this:

 

if( ( (y/(x+y))*100 ) != 0)
         put_proc = ( (y/(x+y))*100 );
      else
         put_proc = 0;

 

Be This?

 

if( ( (y/(y-x))*100 ) != 0)
         put_proc = ( (y/(y-x))*100 );
      else
         put_proc = 0;

 

 

Forget the above but something doesnt seem right with this

 

 if((BULL0+BEAR0)!=0)
         x = (BULL0/(BULL0+BEAR0))*Volume[i+Shift];
      else
         x = 0.1;
      

      if((BEAR0-BULL0)!=0)
         y = (BEAR0/(BEAR0-BULL0))*Volume[i+Shift];
      else
         y = 0.1;
      
      if( ( (x/(x+y))*100) != 0 )
         call_proc = ( (x/(x+y))*100 );
      else
         call_proc = 0;
      
      if( ( (y/(x+y))*100 ) != 0)
         put_proc = ( (y/(x+y))*100 );
      else
         put_proc = 0;


Here is the MTF tools for charts below
 
Attached File  ACP Multi Pair.mq4   2.17KB   399 downloads
Attached File  ACP Arrow Change Pair.mq4   26.49KB   433 downloads
 
Please goto Lazy Larry post http://www.binaryopt...hread/?p=144478for a guide :)

 


#44 Singh

Singh

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 983 posts
  • LocationToronto,Canada

Posted 19 October 2016 - 06:43 PM

You guys might have noticed it too that Sum of x+y is always equal to Volume. So I think you guys dont have to do calculations for both x and y just do X and then vol-x = y. I know not a big deal but might make the coding easy. 

 

That being said I have encountered equal ITM vs OTM when checked manual so far. 

 

Regards

 

Singh

 

Also , Technically % of call put should not go above 100 and sum of call put should always equal to 100 I think. So the indis which are showing more than 100% can be wrong? MAybe I am missing something 


  • hajikiri likes this

"The game taught me the game. And it didn’t spare me rod while teaching."
- Jesse Livermore

 

My Youtube channel for trading videos -  https://www.youtube....user/mindpl4y3r


#45 MTH2014

MTH2014

    The Uncle

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 769 posts
  • LocationIndonesia

Posted 19 October 2016 - 08:32 PM

Lol... too many Horny Guys :)  too few Holey Girls :P  Peoples get mad and forget to use their rational brain... so sad.. :lol:

 

@csandberg ; Brother, will try to look at your coding..

 

MTH


  • hatırlaa likes this

"Some are faster, some are slower, and some will never get it...lol" "You may be right but certainly not the only one...  So, remove that smug smile from your face" :P

"If you are too proud of yourself right now, sooner or later the reality will hit you" "with flock of penguins around me, I will always feel the warmth and happiness"

"if you don't want to ask when you learn, you will never be asked in the future and that means you become nobody"


#46 hajikiri

hajikiri

    Member

  • Banned
  • PipPip
  • 302 posts
  • LocationItaly

Posted 19 October 2016 - 08:35 PM

Good Idea but what is the reason to calculate like this since the result is relatively same with the original value of bear and bull by itself.

for example i got absolute value of 0.020 for bull and 0.027 for bear and volume of 123. the result which i have calculated manually was around 42.5 call and 57.5 put. I think I would have same judgment considering the original value of bear and bull. or may be i am wrong.

 

Secondly what is the logic behind period 2 for bear and bull indicator? why not 4 and why not 14?

 

thirdly (which i hope is not disappointing) my random sampling on 200 candles calculated manually on 1 min candle showed around 55 percent win rate.

Happy trading


  • devhie likes this

What seems too high & risky to most generally goes higher. What seems low & cheap generally goes lower.” William O'Neil


#47 MTH2014

MTH2014

    The Uncle

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 769 posts
  • LocationIndonesia

Posted 19 October 2016 - 09:42 PM

Ok here we go, only logical correction from original code, that when we use bearpower (iBearsPower) data there will always in negative value, so we should make it absolute to create correct percentage calculation..

I'm not change the original theorem of xbeast, because this is 'his' thread.  I just try to fix logical coding error with my old fashioned brain..lol

 

MTH

 

Attached Files


  • zozon, simon1, rider2025 and 4 others like this

"Some are faster, some are slower, and some will never get it...lol" "You may be right but certainly not the only one...  So, remove that smug smile from your face" :P

"If you are too proud of yourself right now, sooner or later the reality will hit you" "with flock of penguins around me, I will always feel the warmth and happiness"

"if you don't want to ask when you learn, you will never be asked in the future and that means you become nobody"


#48 PaititiGold

PaititiGold

    Member

  • Validating
  • PipPip
  • 400 posts

Posted 19 October 2016 - 09:56 PM

Good Idea but what is the reason to calculate like this since the result is relatively same with the original value of bear and bull by itself.

for example i got absolute value of 0.020 for bull and 0.027 for bear and volume of 123. the result which i have calculated manually was around 42.5 call and 57.5 put. I think I would have same judgment considering the original value of bear and bull. or may be i am wrong.

Secondly what is the logic behind period 2 for bear and bull indicator? why not 4 and why not 14?

thirdly (which i hope is not disappointing) my random sampling on 200 candles calculated manually on 1 min candle showed around 55 percent win rate.
Happy trading

Good points.

From observations around the net you get the same type of fiddling of parameters with indis, Singh draws trendlines even then apply technical analysis on it. That's all we've got for indis.

It'll be a miracle if it works but then miracles do happen sometimes.

#49 Sanz50

Sanz50

    Banned for shady commercial activities

  • Banned
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,838 posts
  • LocationArgentina

Posted 19 October 2016 - 10:18 PM

I smell something like this

 

image.png



#50 MTH2014

MTH2014

    The Uncle

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 769 posts
  • LocationIndonesia

Posted 19 October 2016 - 10:28 PM

Ok here we go, only logical correction from original code, that when we use bearpower (iBearsPower) data there will always in negative value, so we should make it absolute to create correct percentage calculation..

I'm not change the original theorem of xbeast, because this is 'his' thread.  I just try to fix logical coding error with my old fashioned brain..lol

 

MTH

 

Still found another logic error..that could make 'zero divide' and 'static object'  when this indicator remove or new candle show up..so this is the corrected version.. (i commented where the error show up)..

 

MTH

 

Note ; if there's no volume or the total strength of bull and bear is 0 , then the result will be zero too...lol... so have fun and keep 'guessing'...

Attached Files


  • nico, teodomiro, rider2025 and 5 others like this

"Some are faster, some are slower, and some will never get it...lol" "You may be right but certainly not the only one...  So, remove that smug smile from your face" :P

"If you are too proud of yourself right now, sooner or later the reality will hit you" "with flock of penguins around me, I will always feel the warmth and happiness"

"if you don't want to ask when you learn, you will never be asked in the future and that means you become nobody"


#51 PaititiGold

PaititiGold

    Member

  • Validating
  • PipPip
  • 400 posts

Posted 19 October 2016 - 10:35 PM

Xbeast, I wrap my head around your formula to figure your intent and it looks like you're trying to smooth the original jagged edge. That's why you look for indi to see the visual.

Curious question, what makes you think that the next candle will pop back when your call/put condition works more on median reads than the usual extreme reads?

#52 Sanz50

Sanz50

    Banned for shady commercial activities

  • Banned
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,838 posts
  • LocationArgentina

Posted 19 October 2016 - 10:50 PM

My first entry with version 0.2.2

 

I use KAZI for S/R indicator

 

When bear candle touch support Call% jump from 50% to 92%

 

I take the trade 5M time frame 1 candle exp.

 

Was ITM.

 

image.png

 

image.png

 

image.png



#53 Sanz50

Sanz50

    Banned for shady commercial activities

  • Banned
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,838 posts
  • LocationArgentina

Posted 19 October 2016 - 11:01 PM

2º trade with version 0.2.2

 

Call indicator 21.88

Put indicator 78.12

 

Bear candle broke support.

 

I take put trade 5M Tf  1 Candle exp.

 

Was ITM

 

image.png



#54 Sanz50

Sanz50

    Banned for shady commercial activities

  • Banned
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,838 posts
  • LocationArgentina

Posted 19 October 2016 - 11:14 PM

3º entry with version 0.2.2

 

Put entry 5M tf 1 Candle Exp

.

Call indicator: 26.18%

Put indicator: 73.82%

 

Was ITM

 

image.png

 

image.png



#55 Sanz50

Sanz50

    Banned for shady commercial activities

  • Banned
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,838 posts
  • LocationArgentina

Posted 19 October 2016 - 11:35 PM

My last entry for tonight

 

I take this trade with 59% put and 41% call and was ITM too

 

Im soo lucky or indicator is working well?

 

4 ITM in ROW

 

image.png

 

image.png



#56 Sanz50

Sanz50

    Banned for shady commercial activities

  • Banned
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,838 posts
  • LocationArgentina

Posted 19 October 2016 - 11:41 PM

Ok Ok this is my last for tonight

 

ITM too..

 

 

5 ITM in row, 4 of them Put entry beacouse trend was down.

 

I think if you take the entry in trend and with indicator 80% work well.

 

 

image.png

 

image.png



#57 odsel

odsel

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 114 posts

Posted 20 October 2016 - 12:08 AM

Still found another logic error..that could make 'zero divide' and 'static object'  when this indicator remove or new candle show up..so this is the corrected version.. (i commented where the error show up)..

 

MTH

 

Note ; if there's no volume or the total strength of bull and bear is 0 , then the result will be zero too...lol... so have fun and keep 'guessing'...

 

Hi MTH, How can I make the values change corner to Upper Right?

I tried inside the code changing the:

                   ObjectSet      ("XBeastPUT",  OBJPROP_CORNER,   1        );

 

But it didn't change anything. Could you help.


Odsel - is actually a randomly generated name. It has no meaning. Once created for a single use, and now I register everywhere using it! ... I feel weird


#58 tarilab

tarilab

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 13 posts

Posted 20 October 2016 - 12:09 AM

My last entry for tonight

 

I take this trade with 59% put and 41% call and was ITM too

 

Im soo lucky or indicator is working well?

 

4 ITM in ROW

 

image.png

 

image.png

I told ya'll before, theres something brewing here.  B)



#59 odsel

odsel

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 114 posts

Posted 20 October 2016 - 12:10 AM

Hi MTH, How can I make the values change corner to Upper Right?

I tried inside the code changing the:

                   ObjectSet      ("XBeastPUT",  OBJPROP_CORNER,   1        );

 

But it didn't change anything. Could you help.

Oh, I found it.

Nevermind :) 


Odsel - is actually a randomly generated name. It has no meaning. Once created for a single use, and now I register everywhere using it! ... I feel weird


#60 odsel

odsel

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 114 posts

Posted 20 October 2016 - 12:49 AM

Please help!

 

Whenever i develop indicator loop i always use this:

 

for(  int i = Bars - MathMin( IndicatorCounted(), Bars ) - 1; i >= 0; i-- )

{

            // code here for a backcount loop

}

 

but seeing MTH's example I am so confused,

I did develop the indicator myself, using my way, eventually I got the values for call% and put% according to this thread logic, I even copied and pasted the inside loop code.

But it always differs from MTH's version, why?

 

please help!

Attached Files


Odsel - is actually a randomly generated name. It has no meaning. Once created for a single use, and now I register everywhere using it! ... I feel weird






Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: holygrail, arrow, percentage, accuarte, 5min, 15min, 30min, signals

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users


USA REGULATION NOTICE: There are many binary options companies which are not regulated within the United States. Most of these offshore companies are not supervised, connected or affiliated with any of the regulatory agencies such as the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), National Futures Association (NFA), Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA).

It is our STRONG opinion that you do not operate with any unregulated brokerage firm as they may steal or try to scam you out of every dime you have. Please take notice that any unregulated trading activity by U.S. Citizens should be considered unlawful.

Risk Disclosure: Binary Options Edge does not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information contained within this website; this includes education material, price quotes and charts, and analysis. Please be aware of the risks associated with trading the financial markets; never invest more money than you can risk losing. The risks involved in trading binary options are high and may not be suitable for all investors. Binary Options Edge doesn't retain responsibility for any trading losses you might face as a result of using the data hosted on this site. The data and quotes contained in this website are not provided by exchanges but rather by market makers. So prices may be different from exchange prices and may not be accurate to real time trading prices. They are supplied as a guide to trading rather than for trading purposes.